Why the study?
Does real time simultaneous triplane three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3P) improve the accuracy of aortic valve area quantification compared to standard 2D echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis?
Does real time simultaneous triplane three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3P) improve the accuracy of aortic valve area quantification compared to standard 2D echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis?
Real-time triplane 3D echocardiography provides a more accurate and reliable noninvasive measurement of aortic valve area than standard 2D methods when compared to invasive catheterization.
RT3P may improve noninvasive AVA accuracy versus 2D in aortic stenosis; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to validate a novel formula for aortic valve area (AVA) based on the principle of continuity equation, that substitutes Doppler-derived stroke volume (SV) by SV directly measured with real time simultaneous triplane three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3P). RT3P has proved accuracy for left ventricular volume calculation. So far, however, neither this potential has been applied to hemodynamic assessment, nor RT3P has succeeded in the evaluation of aortic valve disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: AVA was measured in 21 patients with aortic stenosis using Gorlin's equation, Doppler continuity equation (two-dimensional echocardiography), the novel RT3P method, and by substituting Doppler-derived SV by SV measured with two-dimensional stroke volume (2DSV). RT3P has the best linear association (R(2)= 0.61) and the best correlation with Gorlin of all noninvasive methods (even if not statistically significant). RT3P carries significantly lower mean differences with catheterization, as compared with 2D and 2DSV (Table 4). Standard deviations of mean differences between RT3P and catheterization and between the other echocardiographic methods are not statistically different, even if RT3P seems to be nearer to catheterization. Inter- and intraobserver variability were, respectively, 0.03 +/- 0.11 cm(2) and 0.02 +/- 0.03 cm(2), better than 2D and 2DSV. CONCLUSIONS: RT3P has revealed to be more accurate than two-dimensional method in AVA quantification, with a better intraobserver agreement. In addition, it allows simple and fast image acquisition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alunni et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: