Why the study?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation alter VEGF protein levels and gene expression compared to bare metal stents in patients undergoing PCI for stable angina?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation alter VEGF protein levels and gene expression compared to bare metal stents in patients undergoing PCI for stable angina?
Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce VEGF protein levels and gene expression compared to bare metal stents, which correlates with reduced late luminal loss.
SES may curb restenosis partly via VEGF suppression in stable angina PCI; confirms VEGF as a driver of late luminal loss after stenting.
AIMS: Although previous studies have indicated that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in the vascular-healing process after stent implantation, its effect on in-stent restenosis is unclear. We assessed VEGF serum protein levels and gene expression in peripheral monocytes in relation to in-stent restenosis after implantation of sirolimus-eluting (SES) and bare metal stents (BMS) in a non-blinded, randomized study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two patients (28 men, age 62 +/- 11 years) with stable angina, who underwent elective single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention, were randomized to SES (n = 21) or BMS (n = 21) implantation. VEGF protein levels in the BMS group showed an increasing trend (P = 0.083), whereas in the SES group they decreased significantly (P = 0.002). BMS induced up-regulation of VEGF mRNA levels, whereas for SES down-regulation was observed. There was no correlation between serum levels and late luminal loss. A significant correlation was found between VEGF gene expression and late luminal loss in both groups (BMS: r = 0.98, P < 0.001; SES: r = 0.65, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: SES, in comparison with BMS, results in lower VEGF protein levels and gene expression in peripheral monocytes. The latter shows a positive relationship with in-stent late-luminal loss, suggesting an essential role in the reduced in-stent restenosis seen in SES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kochiadakis et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: