Thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic abdominal surgery

Background: Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there has been a great concern regarding the increased risk of thromboembolism following laparoscopic surgery. However, in the absence of clear guidelines, the use of thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic abdominal surgery is controversial. Methods: The evidence for and against routine and selective thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal procedures was reviewed based mainly on published British and Danish surveys, together with the author's own survey. An attempt was made to come up with a generally‐accepted protocol for thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery. Results: Less thromboembolic events were encountered by laparoscopic surgeons who adopt routine thromboprophylaxis. More thromboembolic events following laparoscopic abdominal surgery were encountered by surgeons adopting selective thromboprophylaxis policy. Conclusion: Routine thromboprophylaxis seems to be more effective in protection against thromboembolism. However, this warrants further confirmation by prospective randomized trials.