Key result
Pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is not linked to increased bleeding versus no prophylaxis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Why the study?
The necessity and safety of pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy remain debated.
Does pharmacological VTE prophylaxis increase the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Cohort (n=1,485)
No
Does pharmacological VTE prophylaxis increase the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.18% vs 0.65%
p-value: p=0.548
Selective use of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not significantly increase the risk of bleeding complications.
Selective prophylaxis was not linked to excess bleeding; leaves open net benefit of VTE prevention after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
OBJECTIVES: This study reports the results of a single center experience on the use of pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. BACKGROUND: The prevention of VTE is of crucial importance in surgical practice. However, the severity of thromboembolism risk and the necessity of thromboprophylaxis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still being debated. METHODS: The data of the patients, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelitiasis in a single center between the years 2005 and 2015 were analysed retrospectively for incidents of symptomatic VTE and bleeding complications. Fisher Exact Test was used to compare the outcomes of the patients who did and did not receive thromboprophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 1485 patients who were included in the study, 307 (20.67 %) having a low VTE risk, did not receive any thromboprophylaxis; while 1178 (79.33 %) with a medium, high or a very high risk received VTE prophylaxis. A bleeding complication occurred in 14 (1.18 %) patients receiving prophylaxis and in 2 (0.65 %) patients not receiving prophylaxis (p = 0.548). No patients in this study experienced clinically symptomatic VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that the selective use of thromboprophylaxis does not significantly increase the risk of bleeding after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and probably decreases the incidence of symptomatic thrombotic complications (Ref. 18)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gündoğdu et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic cholelithiasis (n=1,485). Pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (Enoxaparin) vs. No VTE prophylaxis was evaluated on Bleeding complications (p=0.548). Selective use of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis did not significantly increase the risk of bleeding complications compared to no prophylaxis (1.18% vs 0.65%, p=0.548) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: