Experimental and numerical study uncovers distinct circumferential deformation patterns in ring-stiffened shells under underwater blast, indicating motion amplitude does not match local strain.
Ring-stiffened cylindrical shells are widely used as load-bearing components in submarine pressure-hull sections. Existing underwater explosion studies have mainly emphasized incident-face denting or global failure, leaving unresolved how circumferential shock-wave diffraction and internal structural load transfer produce different response sequences and plastic-strain accumulation at the incident, side, and rear faces. A mechanism-oriented underwater explosion model test was conducted using a 44 g TNT charge at a stand-off distance of 0.50 m, and a fluid–structure interaction model was established in MSC.Dytran using the general coupling method. The model incorporated the Cowper–Symonds strain-rate effect of 16MnR steel and was validated against the Cole empirical peak pressure and measured incident-face residual deformations. The calculated free-field peak pressure was 35.50 MPa, with an error of 0.65%, while the mean relative error of the six residual-deformation measurements was 13.50%. The shell plating between adjacent ring stiffeners exhibited higher velocity and acceleration peaks than the stiffeners, indicating the local constraint imposed by the ring stiffeners. The side-face nodes showed symmetric transverse expansion, and the corresponding elements exhibited no discernible equivalent plastic strain. The rear-face center displayed a delayed axial response, and its representative element reached a final equivalent plastic strain of approximately 1.32×10−3, compared with 0.40×10−3 for the incident-face element. These results identify distinct circumferential response modes and show that macroscopic motion amplitude is not simply correlated with local plastic deformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: