Key result
A one-year peer-group-based intervention did not demonstrate significant differences in the change of overall Fuster-BEWAT score from screening compared to control at 52 months (0.64 vs 0.46; P=0.497).
Why the study?
Although a peer-group-based intervention improved healthy behaviors immediately post-intervention, the long-term sustainability of a 1-year intervention on CV health and behavior remained unknown.
Does a 12-month peer-group-based intervention improve long-term cardiovascular health scores in adults with at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor?
RCT (n=543)
1:1
Does a 12-month peer-group-based intervention improve long-term cardiovascular health scores in adults with at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.64% vs 0.46%
p-value: p=.497
A one-year peer-group-based intervention improved cardiovascular health behaviors at 12 months, but these benefits were not sustained at 52 months.
No sustained benefit seen with peer-group intervention; leaves open efficacy of lifestyle programs in randomized prevention trials.
BACKGROUND: The Fifty-Fifty trial demonstrated that a peer-group-based intervention was able to improve healthy behaviors in individuals with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors immediately post-intervention. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term sustainability of a one-year peer-group-based intervention focused on CV health and behavior. METHODS: A total of 543 adults aged 25 to 50 years with at least 1 CV risk factor were screened and recruited, received initial training through workshops, and were then randomized 1:1 to a peer-group-based intervention group (IG) or a self-management control group (CG) for 12 months. At a median of 52 months from baseline, 321 participants were re-assessed (~60% retention). The primary outcome was the mean change in a composite health score related to blood pressure, exercise, weight, alimentation, and tobacco use (Fuster-BEWAT score [FBS], range 0-15). Intervention effects were assessed using linear-mixed effects models. RESULTS: The mean age of retained participants was 48.0 years (SD: 5.4), and 73% were female. Consistent with previous results, the change of overall FBS was significantly greater in the IG than in the CG at 12-month follow-up (between-group difference, 0.60 points; 95% CI, 0.08-1.12; P = .025). Assessment of long-term sustainability (52-month follow-up) showed that there were no between-group differences in the mean overall FBS (IG mean score, 8.52; 95% CI, 7.97-9.07 vs CG mean score, 8.51; 95% CI, 7.93-9.10; P = .972) or in the change of overall FBS from screening (IG mean change, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.00-1.28; CG mean change, 0.46; 95% CI, -0.20-1.12; P = .497). CONCLUSIONS: A one-year peer-group-based intervention showed favorable results at immediate post-intervention but did not demonstrate significant differences between the IG and CG at 52 months. Combination of an initial training period (workshops) with the maintenance of peer-support groups or other re-intervention strategies may be required to achieve sustained effects on healthy behaviors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02367963. Registered (https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02367963).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández-Alvira et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in cardiovascular risk factors (n=543). peer-group-based intervention vs. self-management control group was evaluated on mean change in a composite health score related to blood pressure, exercise, weight, alimentation, and tobacco use (Fuster-BEWAT score [FBS], range 0-15) (p=.497). A one-year peer-group-based intervention did not demonstrate significant differences in the change of overall Fuster-BEWAT score from screening compared to control at 52 months (0.64 vs 0.46; P=0.497).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: