Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Where inert polyethylene cubes comprised 4.0, 7.5, 13.5, and 22.6% of the total ration consumed, feed intake (not including polyethylene cubes) was reduced by 3.1, 4.4, 6.0, and 25.6%, whereas total intake (including polyethylene cubes) changed by 0.8, 3.5, 9.0, and --3.9%, respectively. The data show that 4.0 and 7.5% cubes in the diet had little effect on intake, which is taken as evidence that added mass or bulk in the diet was of minor importance in determining the voluntary feed intake of 500-kg cattle consuming daily quantities of dry matter in the amount of 12.9 kg or less. At the very high levels the animals discriminated against the cubes. Three trials were conducted to study the effect of additional inert mass placed in the rumen on voluntary intake. Mass (containerized polyethylene cubes or water) was added to the rumen at levels of 1.6, 4.9, and 8.2% of metabolic size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carr et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: