Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The over-estimation of mean wind speed in a variable wind is investigated for Sheppard and Meteorological Office patterns of the 3-cup anemometer. Comparison of Schrenk's theory with observation shows satisfactory agreement for hemispherical cups. Conical cups over-estimate mean wind speed to a much smaller extent than hemispherical cups and are to be preferred therefore when unsteady winds, e.g. natural winds, are to be measured. For a given cup form over-estimation appears to be a minimum for minimum mass per unit area of cup; other parameters such as cup diameter and arm length are of secondary importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scrase et al. (1944) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: