Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract : Use of lower tidal volumes during mechanical ventilation is associated with reduced morbidity and of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Use of lower tidal could also protect ICU patients without ARDS. While use of higher tidal volumes is strongly discouraged in patients, guidelines do not yet recommend on tidal volume size in patients not suffering from this complication, in unwanted variable mechanical ventilation settings amongst ICU patients. : The present study aims to determine ventilation characteristics, including tidal volume size in intubated mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs in Europe, Australia and the Americas. Ventilation characteristics and are compared among patients without ARDS, patients at risk for ARDS and patients with mild, moderate or ARDS. : The ‘PRatice of VENTilation in critically ill patients without ARDS’ study (PRoVENT) is an international observational study in critically ill intubated and ventilated ICU patients by the PROVENet (PROtective Network) investigators (http://www.provenet.eu/). At least 1,000 patients under invasive mechanical are included in a time window of 7 days, and followed up to the end of stay in ICU. The primary endpoint is variability of tidal volume size in ventilated patients in ICUs in Europe, Australia and the Americas. : PRoVENT is designed to investigate and compare tidal volume settings in patients without ARDS, at risk for ARDS, and patients with mild, moderate or severe ARDS, and to determine the impact of tidal size on important clinical endpoints, in particular patients without ARDS. PRoVENT shall provide information on settings that could be used in future trials of ventilation, especially in ICU patients without or at risk for ARDS
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2013 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: