Key result
A structured educational intervention improved adherence to guidelines in 3 of 8 indicators for acute HF, 2 of 3 for preserved/mid-range EF, and 6 of 9 for reduced EF.
Why the study?
Guideline adherence in managing acute and chronic HF across Italian cardiology sites was evaluated to assess whether an ad-hoc educational intervention could improve performance on pharmacological and non-pharmacological indicators.
Does a structured educational intervention improve adherence to guideline recommendations in patients with acute and chronic heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=7,218)
Yes
Does a structured educational intervention improve adherence to guideline recommendations in patients with acute and chronic heart failure?
A structured multifaceted educational intervention can improve adherence to specific guideline-directed medical therapy indicators in patients with heart failure.
Educational reminders may boost HF guideline adherence; supports targeted quality initiatives but leaves open causal impact and generalizability.
AIMS: To assess adherence to guideline recommendations among a large network of Italian cardiology sites in the management of acute and chronic heart failure (HF) and to evaluate if an ad-hoc educational intervention can improve their performance on several pharmacological and non-pharmacological indicators. METHODS AND RESULTS: BLITZ-HF was a cross-sectional study based on a web-based recording system with pop-up reminders on guideline recommendations used during two 3-month enrolment periods carried out 3 months apart (Phase 1 and 3), interspersed by face-to-face macro-regional benchmark analyses and educational meetings (Phase 2). Overall, 7218 patients with acute and chronic HF were enrolled at 106 cardiology sites. During the enrolment phases, 3920 and 3298 patients were included, respectively, 84% with chronic HF and 16% with acute HF in Phase 1, and 74% with chronic HF and 26% with acute HF in Phase 3. At baseline, adherence to guideline recommendations was already overall high for most indicators. Among acute HF patients, an improvement was obtained in three out of eight indicators, with a significant rise in echocardiographic evaluation. Among chronic HF patients with HF and preserved or mid-range ejection fraction, performance increased in two out of three indicators: creatinine and echocardiographic evaluations. An overall performance improvement was observed in six out of nine indicators in ambulatory HF with reduced ejection fraction patients with a significant increase in angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor prescription rates. CONCLUSIONS: Within a context of an already elevated level of adherence to HF guideline recommendations, a structured multifaceted educational intervention could be useful to improve performance on specific indicators. Extending this approach to other non-cardiology healthcare professionals, who usually manage patients with HF, should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulizia et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute and chronic heart failure (n=7,218). Structured multifaceted educational intervention vs. Baseline adherence (Phase 1) was evaluated on Adherence to guideline recommendations on pharmacological and non-pharmacological indicators. A structured educational intervention improved adherence to guidelines in 3 of 8 indicators for acute HF, 2 of 3 for preserved/mid-range EF, and 6 of 9 for reduced EF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: