Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 2003Transplantation

The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CSChristopher J. SonnendayNHS Blood and TransplantMCMatthew CooperMedical College of WisconsinEKEdward S. KrausJohns Hopkins University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Sonnenday et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8b2ea090fae8fd47e96f0dhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000065296.35395.fd
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pulsatile kidney perfusion for evaluation of high‐risk kidney donors safely expands the donor pool1994 · 76 citations
  2. 2Risk factors for delayed graft function after renal transplantation and their significance for long-term clinical outcome2002 · 87 citations
  3. 3A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF COLD STORAGE VERSUS PULSATILE PERFUSION FOR CADAVER KIDNEY PRESERVATION1987 · 76 citations
  4. 4A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED TRIAL OF COLD-STORAGE VERSUS MACHINE-PERFUSION PRESERVATION IN CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1990 · 86 citations
  5. 5PRINCIPLES OF SOLID-ORGAN PRESERVATION BY COLD STORAGE1988 · 1,389 citations