Why the study?
Does breathing through an active inspiratory threshold device improve tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia and maintain stroke volume in humans?
Does breathing through an active inspiratory threshold device improve tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia and maintain stroke volume in humans?
Breathing against inspiratory resistance increases tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia by mechanically maintaining stroke volume, cardiac output, and arterial blood pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid tolerance during simulated hypovolemia; leaves open translation to clinical hemorrhage or trauma.
Inspiratory resistance induced by breathing through an impedance threshold device (ITD) reduces intrathoracic pressure and increases stroke volume (SV) in supine normovolemic humans. We hypothesized that breathing through an ITD would also be associated with a protection of SV and a subsequent increase in the tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia. Eight volunteers (5 men, 3 women) were instrumented to record ECG and beat-by-beat arterial pressure and SV (Finometer). Tolerance to progressive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) was assessed while subjects breathed against either 0 (sham ITD) or -7 cmH(2)O inspiratory resistance (active ITD); experiments were performed on separate days. Because the active ITD increased LBNP tolerance time from 2,014 +/- 106 to 2,259 +/- 138 s (P = 0.006), data were analyzed (time and frequency domains) under both conditions at the time at which cardiovascular collapse occurred during the sham experiment to determine the mechanisms underlying this protective effect. At this time point, arterial blood pressure, SV, and cardiac output were higher (P < or = 0.005) when breathing on the active ITD rather than the sham ITD, whereas indirect indicators of autonomic activity (low- and high-frequency oscillations of the R-to-R interval) were not altered. ITD breathing did not alter the transfer function between systolic arterial pressure and R-to-R interval, indicating that integrated baroreflex sensitivity was similar between the two conditions. These data show that breathing against inspiratory resistance increases tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia by better maintaining SV, cardiac output, and arterial blood pressures via primarily mechanical rather than neural mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryan et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: