Why the study?
Does thrombectomy prior to stenting improve clinical outcomes and myocardial perfusion in patients with ACS undergoing PCI?
Does thrombectomy prior to stenting improve clinical outcomes and myocardial perfusion in patients with ACS undergoing PCI?
This review summarizes the evidence for manual and mechanical thrombectomy during PCI in patients with ACS and high thrombotic burden.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thrombectomy may be selectively considered in high-thrombus-burden ACS; review leaves open optimal device and patient-selection strategies.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, (pPCI), of native coronaries and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), is the recommended reperfusion strategy for STEMI, and an early invasive approach is recommended for high risk patients with UA/NSTEMI. Although PCI effectively restores flow in the infarct related artery/culprit vessel in both situations, myocardial perfusion often remains suboptimal due to microvascular obstruction, partly attributed to distal embolization of thrombus. Hence, thrombectomy (manual or mechanical), prior to stenting may further reduce hard clinical end points in patients with ACS. This article discusses accumulated evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy in culprit native coronaries and SVGs in such patients, as well as possible strategies for maximizing its benefits relative to the size of the thrombotic burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexopoulos et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: