Why the study?
Does biventricular therapy attenuate left ventricular remodeling in patients with recent myocardial infarction, ejection fraction ≤30%, and narrow QRS?
Does biventricular therapy attenuate left ventricular remodeling in patients with recent myocardial infarction, ejection fraction ≤30%, and narrow QRS?
Early biventricular pacing after myocardial infarction in patients with reduced ejection fraction and narrow QRS is feasible and may attenuate subsequent left ventricular dilation.
Supports early biventricular pacing to limit post-MI remodeling in low-EF narrow-QRS patients; extends CRT evidence beyond wide-QRS populations.
To test the hypothesis that biventricular pacing after a myocardial infarction with reduced ejection fraction can attenuate left ventricular (LV) remodeling, the authors studied 18 patients (myocardial infarction within 30–45 days, ejection fraction ≤30%, narrow QRS) randomized to biventricular therapy (biventricular therapy + defibrillator) (biventricular group) or implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator alone (control group). At 1, 6, and 12 months, there were no differences in functional or clinical parameters (New York Heart Association, quality of life, 6‐minute walk). Twelve‐month LV volume remained stable in the biventricular group, but increased in the control group (median LV end‐diastolic volume increase, 6.5 mL in biventricular vs 35 mL in control; P=.03; median LV end‐diastolic volume decrease, 5.5 mL in biventricular vs 30.5‐mL increase in control; P=.11). Biventricular therapy also prevented an increase in sphericity index at 12 months (median, −2% in biventricular vs 37% in control; P=.06). Delivery of biventricular therapy early after myocardial infarction appears safe and feasible and may attenuate subsequent LV dilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: