Key result
A quality-improvement heart failure checklist reduced 30-day readmissions (6% vs 19%) and 6-month readmissions (23% vs 42%) compared with a randomly selected control group.
Why the study?
Does a quality-improvement heart failure checklist improve quality of care and reduce readmissions in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure?
Population
96 patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure
Comparison
Quality-improvement heart failure checklist vs Randomly selected control group receiving…
Design
RCT, Randomly selected patients for checklist group and randomly selected…
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports routine HF discharge checklist use to cut readmissions; provides RCT confirmation of prior observational benefits.
RCT (n=96)
Randomly selected
Does a quality-improvement heart failure checklist improve quality of care and reduce readmissions in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 19%
The implementation of a simple discharge checklist for patients with acute decompensated heart failure significantly improves guideline-directed medical therapy utilization and reduces both 30-day and 6-month readmission rates.
Basoor et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Acute decompensated heart failure (n=96). Quality-improvement heart failure checklist vs. Randomly selected control group was evaluated on 30-day readmission. A quality-improvement heart failure checklist reduced 30-day readmissions (6% vs 19%) and 6-month readmissions (23% vs 42%) compared with a randomly selected control group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: