Key result
CHF checklist management reduces 18-month heart failure re-hospitalizations ~52% vs. usual care.
Why the study?
The efficacy of chronic heart failure (CHF) checklist management in reducing adverse outcomes among heart failure patients remained uncertain.
Does CHF checklist management reduce mortality and heart failure re-hospitalization in adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=132)
Open-label
Random number method (1:1 ratio)
No
Does CHF checklist management reduce mortality and heart failure re-hospitalization in adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure?
Checklist management reduces HF rehospitalization in chronic heart failure; extends evidence for structured protocols while leaving mortality benefit open.
Background: The efficacy of chronic heart failure (CHF) checklist management in reducing adverse outcomes of heart failure patients is still uncertain. This study explores whether CHF checklist management is more useful than usual care in reducing adverse health outcomes in the medium- and long-term among CHF patients. Methods: In our prospective study, 132 patients with CHF were randomly assigned to CHF management group and usual care group by random number method. Patients in CHF management group were conducted through CHF checklist by cardiologists and general practitioner. Patients assigned to usual care were treated by non-stationary medical group without checklist. All groups were followed up for 18 months. Results: There was no significant difference in overall mortality rate between management group and control group during 18 months (12.3% [8/65] vs. 11.7% [7/60], P = 0. 912]). The re-hospitalization rate of heart failure in management group (18.5% [12/65]) was significantly lower than that in usual care group (38.3% [23/60]) after 18 months of follow-up (P = 0.013). Median NT-proBNP level (632.3 ng/l vs. 1678 ng/l, p = 0.004) was lower in management group than that in usual care group. Cardiac ultrasonography was performed at 18 months between the management and usual care group. LVEDD (55.88±7.11 mm vs. 60.92±8.06 mm) and LVESD (43.25±8.42mm vs. 48.41± 9.02mm) were decreased (P<0.01). LVEF was increased (45.36±10.64% vs. 39.96 ±10.15%, P<0.01). The utilization rate of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, β-blocker were high in management group. Conclusion: CHF checklist management by cardiologists and general practitioners can significantly reduce the re-hospitalization and improve cardiac function. CHF management through heart failure checklist may improve prognosis in patients with CHF in the medium- and long-term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure (n=132). CHF checklist management vs. Usual care was evaluated on Heart failure re-hospitalization rate (p=0.013). CHF checklist management significantly reduced the 18-month heart failure re-hospitalization rate to 18.5% compared to 38.3% with usual care (p=0.013) in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: