Why the study?
It was unknown whether left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is associated with pulmonary edema in septic patients.
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is not a major contributor to pulmonary edema in adult septic patients.
LVDD unlikely to drive LUSS in sepsis; this cohort finding leaves open alternative edema mechanisms for prospective study.
Purpose We aimed to investigate whether left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is associated with pulmonary edema in septic patients. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult septic patients between October 2018 and May 2019. We performed repeated echocardiography and lung ultrasound examinations within the first 7 days after diagnosis of sepsis. We defined LVDD according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and—for sensitivity analysis—according to an algorithm which has been validated in septic patients. We quantified pulmonary edema using the lung ultrasound score (LUSS), counting B-lines in four intercostal spaces. Results We included 54 patients. LVDD was present in 51 (42%) of 122 echocardiography examinations. The mean (±SD) LUSS was 11 ± 6. There was no clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS (B = 0.55 [95%CI: −1.38; 2.47]; p = 0.571). Pneumonia was significantly associated with higher LUSS (B = 4.42 [95%CI: 0.38; 8.5]; p = 0.033). Conclusion The lack of a clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS suggests that LVDD is not a major contributor to pulmonary edema in septic patients. Trial Registration NCT03768752, ClinicalTrials.gov , November 30th, 2018 - retrospectively registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahl et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: