Why the study?
Ganglionated plexuses of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic system may play a role in AF, motivating the hypothesis that ablating ectopy-triggering ganglionated plexuses prevents AF.
Does ganglionated plexus ablation prevent atrial arrhythmia recurrence compared to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does ganglionated plexus ablation prevent atrial arrhythmia recurrence compared to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Ganglionated plexus ablation did not prevent atrial arrhythmias more effectively than pulmonary vein isolation, though it required less radiofrequency ablation time and resulted in a greater reduction in antiarrhythmic drug usage.
Ganglionated plexus ablation did not outperform pulmonary vein isolation; challenges standalone use in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and warrants adjunctive trials.
BACKGROUND: The ganglionated plexuses (GPs) of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic system may play a role in atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that ablating the ectopy-triggering GPs (ET-GPs) prevents AF. METHODS: GANGLIA-AF (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02487654) was a prospective, randomized, controlled, 3-center trial. ET-GPs were mapped using high frequency stimulation, delivered within the atrial refractory period and ablated until nonfunctional. If triggered AF became incessant, atrioventricular dissociating GPs were ablated. We compared GP ablation (GPA) without pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) against PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF. Follow-up was for 12 months including 3-monthly 48-hour Holter monitors. The primary end point was documented ≥30 seconds of atrial arrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: A total of 102 randomized patients were analyzed on a per-protocol basis after GPA (n = 52; 51%) or PVI (n = 50; 49%). Patients who underwent GPA had 89 ± 26 high frequency stimulation sites tested, identifying a median of 18.5% (interquartile range 16%-21%) of GPs. The radiofrequency ablation time was 22.9 ± 9.8 minutes in GPA and 38 ± 14.4 minutes in PVI (P < .0001). The freedom from ≥30 seconds of atrial arrhythmia at 12-month follow-up was 50% (26 of 52) with GPA vs 64% (32 of 50) with PVI (log-rank, P = .09). ET-GPA without atrioventricular dissociating GPA achieved 58% (22 of 38) freedom from the primary end point. There was a significantly higher reduction in antiarrhythmic drug usage postablation after GPA than after PVI (55.5% vs 36%; P = .05). Patients were referred for redo ablation procedures in 31% (16 of 52) after GPA and 24% (12 of 50) after PVI (P = .53). CONCLUSION: GPA did not prevent atrial arrhythmias more than PVI. However, less radiofrequency ablation was delivered to achieve a higher reduction in antiarrhythmic drug usage with GPA than with PVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: