Key result
Omapatrilat reduces baseline endogenous glucose production ~35% versus placebo in insulin-resistant rats.
Why the study?
The insulin-sensitizing effects and mechanisms of the vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat have not been investigated in insulin-resistant models.
Does omapatrilat improve insulin sensitivity and myocardial glucose uptake in insulin-resistant Zucker fatty rats?
Does omapatrilat improve insulin sensitivity and myocardial glucose uptake in insulin-resistant Zucker fatty rats?
Omapatrilat induces profound insulin sensitization and increases myocardial glucose uptake in a rat model of insulin resistance, suggesting potential for type 2 diabetes prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change human practice; hypothesis-generating for omapatrilat in insulin-resistant models.
Background— ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) improve insulin resistance and prevent type 2 diabetes, possibly mediated by inhibition of bradykinin (BK) degradation. The vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat (OMA) raises BK to a greater extent than ACEIs by dual enzyme inhibition, whereas its insulin-sensitizing effects and mechanisms have not been investigated. Methods and Results— We compared the insulin-sensitizing effects of OMA, ramipril (an ACEI), losartan (an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker), and placebo by 2-step euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in insulin-resistant Zucker fatty rats (n=6 to 7 in each group). OMA resulted in a lower rate of endogenous glucose production than placebo at baseline (35±5 versus 54±4 mmol · kg −1 · min −1 , P <0.01), greater suppression of endogenous glucose production by low-dose insulin (73±11% versus 27±18%, P <0.05), and greater glucose disposal at high-dose insulin (135±5 versus 92±4 mmol · kg −1 · min −1 , P <0.01). Ramipril tended to improve insulin sensitivity, but losartan did not. OMA significantly increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake by myocardium, fat, and skeletal muscle. Ramipril increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake only by some skeletal muscles, but losartan did not. The insulin-sensitizing effects of OMA were blocked significantly by HOE-140 (a BK, B 2 receptor antagonist) and N G -nitro- l -arginine methyl ester (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) in all tissues except myocardium. Conclusions— OMA induces profound insulin sensitization and increases myocardial glucose uptake in Zucker fatty rats. This effect is greater than that of ramipril and probably occurs at least in part via stimulation of the B 2 receptor. OMA has the potential for greater type 2 diabetes prevention than ACEI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2003) studied Insulin resistance. Omapatrilat vs. Placebo was evaluated on Rate of endogenous glucose production at baseline (mmol · kg−1 · min−1) (p=<0.01). Omapatrilat yielded a lower baseline endogenous glucose production rate than placebo (35 vs 54 mmol/kg/min, P<0.01) and greater high-dose insulin glucose disposal in Zucker fatty rats.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: