Why the study?
The effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor on glycemic control in Korean patients required investigation.
Does ARNI improve glycemic control (HbA1c reduction) compared to ACEIs or ARBs in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=1,555)
No
Does ARNI improve glycemic control (HbA1c reduction) compared to ACEIs or ARBs in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes?
In a real-world cohort of patients with heart failure and diabetes, ARNI did not significantly lower HbA1c levels compared to ACEIs or ARBs after adjusting for confounding factors, though unadjusted analyses suggested a potential glucose-lowering trend.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No support for ARNI to improve glycemic control in HF with diabetes; leaves open effects for randomized confirmation.
We investigated the effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) on glycemic control in Korean patients. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital. We compared the HbA1c level reduction between the ARNI and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in chronic heart failure patients with diabetes. We also examined whether the target HbA1c level was reached and the time to start insulin between the two groups. Over the study period, ARNI did not significantly lower the HbA1c level after adjusting confounding factors compared to ACEIs or ARBs. However, as a result of a simple comparison using Mann–Whitney U test, ARNI group showed significant decrease in HbA1c at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to ACEIs or ARBs group (p = 0.003, 0.009, and 0.026, respectively). The initiation of insulin was delayed in the ARNI group, but this difference was not significant based on the result of hazard ratio, but cumulative incidence was significantly lower in the ARNI group. In the real world, the blood glucose-control effects of ARNI were not superior to those of ACEIs or ARBs. However, long-term studies are needed as ARNI use increases to obtain more statistically significant results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure and type 2 diabetes (n=1,555). Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) vs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) was evaluated on Overall change in HbA1c levels from baseline (MD 0.005, 95% CI -0.009 to 0.019, p=0.511).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: