Key result
Triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery for adult atrial septal defect closure reduced 24-hour chest drainage (98.6 vs 222.6 ml; P=0.032) and hospital stay compared to right minithoracotomy.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the safety, feasibility, and advantages of triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery in repairing adult atrial septal defect.
Does triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery improve clinical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction compared to right minithoracotomy in adults undergoing atrial septal defect closure?
Cohort (n=121)
No
Does triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery improve clinical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction compared to right minithoracotomy in adults undergoing atrial septal defect closure?
Absolute Event Rate: 98.6% vs 222.6%
p-value: p=0.032
Triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to right minithoracotomy for adult ASD closure, offering reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and better cosmetic outcomes.
Triport thoracoscopy was associated with less drainage and shorter stay in ASD closure; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to investigate the safety and feasibility of triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery (TPTS) and its advantages in repairing adult atrial septal defect. METHODS: Between January 2017 and January 2020, a total of 121 consecutive adult patients underwent atrial septal defect closure in our institution. Of these, 30 patients had TPTS and 31 patients had a right minithoracotomy (RMT). Operational data and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The total operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time in the TPTS group were slightly longer than those in the RMT group, but there were no differences between the 2 groups. Compared with the RMT group, the TPTS group showed a decrease in the volume of chest drainage in 24 h (98.6 ± 191.2 vs 222.6 ± 217.2 ml; P = 0.032) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.5 ± 1.5 vs 8.0 ± 3.7 days; P = 0.042). The numeric rating scale on postoperative day 7 was significantly less in the TPTS group than in the RMT group (2.82 ± 1.14 vs 3.56 ± 1.42; P = 0.034). The patient satisfaction scale for the cosmetic results in the TPTS group was significantly higher than in the RMT group (4.68 ± 0.55 vs 4.22 ± 0.76; P = 0.012). No differences were found in postoperative complications. No in-hospital death or major adverse events occurred in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: TPTS is safe and feasible for the closure of adult atrial septal defect. Compared with RMT, it has been associated with less pain and better cosmetic outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Adult atrial septal defect (n=121). Triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery (TPTS) vs. Right minithoracotomy (RMT) was evaluated on Volume of chest drainage in 24 h (ml) (p=0.032). Triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery for adult atrial septal defect closure reduced 24-hour chest drainage (98.6 vs 222.6 ml; P=0.032) and hospital stay compared to right minithoracotomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: