Key result
Implementation of the ERAS program across the Alberta Health System reduced postoperative complications by 12% and median length of stay by one day in colorectal surgery, while generating significant net cost savings.
Why the study?
Does the implementation of the ERAS protocol improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs in surgical patients?
Does the implementation of the ERAS protocol improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs in surgical patients?
System-wide implementation of the ERAS protocol in a publicly funded health system significantly reduces postoperative complications, length of stay, and healthcare costs.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) was implemented across Alberta Health Services, a single payer publicly funded provincial health system starting in 2013. Implementation across multiple provincial sites in colorectal surgery reduced postoperative complications by 12% and median length of stay by one day. Subsequent implementation in gynecologic oncology reduced postoperative complications by 17% and length of stay by 2 days in high complexity surgery. Implementation has had an estimated net savings in the province of $7.22 million Canadian dollars (CAD) over 5 years with a return on investment of $1.05 to $7.31 for every dollar invested in the project. Patient involvement enabled success of the program, with support, education, and mitigation of patient stress identified as key components for success. Provider knowledge and motivation were essential to ensure ongoing compliance with ERAS guidelines. Provider education, and demonstration of improvement in patient outcomes using audit is one method to ensure continued motivation from care providers. Systemlevel leadership is essential to provide consistent messaging and support for initiatives, while providerlevel leadership in the form of physician champions and nurse coordinators ensures compliance and appropriate integration of ERAS into daily practice. Implementation of ERAS across a unified health care system has improved patient outcomes while saving resources. Further research into expansion of the program to community hospitals and all surgical domains is underway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bisch et al. (2021) conducted a review in Patients undergoing major surgery (colorectal, gynecologic oncology, pancreatic, urologic, hepatic) (n=9,406). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program vs. Historical controls (traditional care) was evaluated on Postoperative complications (colorectal surgery cohort) (p=0.014). Implementation of the ERAS program across the Alberta Health System reduced postoperative complications by 12% and median length of stay by one day in colorectal surgery, while generating significant net cost savings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: