Why the study?
Do concentrations of Ca2+-ATPase and Na+-K+-ATPase differ in skeletal muscle of patients susceptible vs nonsusceptible to malignant hyperthermia?
Do concentrations of Ca2+-ATPase and Na+-K+-ATPase differ in skeletal muscle of patients susceptible vs nonsusceptible to malignant hyperthermia?
Changes in the concentration of Ca2+-ATPase and/or Na+-K+-ATPase do not appear to play a primary role in the pathogenesis of malignant hyperthermia.
ATPase levels do not aid MH diagnosis; leaves open other mechanisms and does not support their role in pathogenesis.
The purpose of this study was to determine the concentration of Ca(2+)-ATPase and Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase in biopsies from vastus lateralis muscle of 24 patients, who underwent a diagnostic contracture test for susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia (MH). Ca(2+)-ATPase was quantified as the Ca(2+)-dependent 32P incorporation in whole muscle homogenates. Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase was quantified as the [3H]ouabain-binding capacity in intact muscle samples. These methods avoid isolation of membranes, a procedure that may influence the results due to interindividual variation in recovery. The results show that both enzymes can be determined in (frozen) muscle biopsies weighing 50 mg. Neither the concentration of Ca(2+)-ATPase nor that of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase differed in biopsies from subjects diagnosed as susceptible (MHS) or nonsusceptible (MHN) to MH. Our data support the view that changes in the concentration of Ca(2+)-ATPase and/or Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase do not play a primary role in the pathogenesis of MH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Everts et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: