Why the study?
How does a ventricular extrasystolic beat affect post-extrasystolic left ventricular peak pressure in patients with and without left ventricular failure?
How does a ventricular extrasystolic beat affect post-extrasystolic left ventricular peak pressure in patients with and without left ventricular failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Post-extrasystolic left ventricular peak pressure increases in patients with left ventricular failure compared to normal patients, driven by differences in stroke volume and arterial hemodynamics.
18 patients without valvular pathology, coronary artery disease, or idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis were haemodynamically and angiographically investigated in order to analyse the effects of a ventricular extrasystolic beat upon the post-extrasystolic left ventricular peak pressure. In eight normal patients (group I), the post-extrasystolic peak pressure (P.ES.P.P.) was lower than that of the pre-extrasystolic beat; in 10 patients with symptoms of left ventricular failure (group II) the P.ES.P.P. significantly increased. The reasons are: 1) cardiac origin: stroke volume increased more in group II; 2) arterial origin. a) aortic compliance was lower in group II (this is probably related to the older age of patients in group II), and by decrease in end-diastolic aortic pressure was smaller in group II. Part of this arterial effect (2b) may probably be explained from the fact that post-extrasystolic compensatory pauses are equal in both groups, but the decay time of arterial pressure during diastole (assuming an exponential decay) is larger in group II. At the same age and with the identical aortic compliance only the two factors 1 and 2b play a part in the changes in P.ES.P.P.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merillon et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: