Why the study?
Does propofol induce dilation and inhibit constriction in guinea pig basilar arteries?
Does propofol induce dilation and inhibit constriction in guinea pig basilar arteries?
Propofol directly induces vasodilation and inhibits vasoconstriction in guinea pig basilar arteries via calcium-dependent mechanisms.
Hypothesis-generating for propofol's calcium-dependent cerebral vascular effects in animals; should not yet influence human practice.
The present study investigated the direct action of propofol on guinea pig basilar arterial rings and the possible underlying mechanisms.Arterial rings, with and without endothelium, were mounted in an organ bath and connected to an isometric tension recording system. The effects of propofol (0.63-20 micro gram/mL) were compared with those of Intralipid Registered Trademark (n = 13) after equilibration and precontraction by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). In another group (n = 8), after pretreatment with either propofol (5 micro gram/mL) or Intralipid Registered Trademark, a contraction by 35 mM KCl was obtained and compared. Another group (n = 12) were incubated in Ca2+-free Krebs buffer and after depolarization by 45 mM KCl, a dose-response curve to CaCl2 was obtained to compare the effect of propofol (5 micro gram/mL) and Intralipid Registered Trademark on the influx of Ca2+. Finally, in Ca2+-free Krebs buffer, the effect of Intralipid Registered Trademark or propofol on 5-HT-evoked contractions (n = 6) were assessed. Propofol caused significant dilation with or without endothelium present, inhibited KCl-induced contraction, and significantly lowered the dose-response curve for CaCl2. In Ca2+-free Krebs buffer, propofol significantly inhibited 5-HT-evoked contraction, which is dependent on intracellular Ca2+-release. In conclusion, propofol inhibited vasoconstriction and induced vasodilation by mechanisms consistent with reduced extracellular calcium influx and suppressed intracellular calcium release. (Anesth Analg 1996;83:472-6)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelb et al. (1996) studied this question.