Why the study?
ICDs terminate malignant arrhythmias in symptomatic Brugada syndrome but do not prevent them, prompting the use of long-term medical therapy such as quinidine and cilostazol for recurrent VT/VF episodes.
Does quinidine suspension lead to arrhythmic storm in a patient with Brugada syndrome?
Does quinidine suspension lead to arrhythmic storm in a patient with Brugada syndrome?
Quinidine suspension in a patient with Brugada syndrome can lead to an arrhythmic storm, highlighting its therapeutic importance and the negative impact of its lack of availability.
Quinidine suspension may precipitate arrhythmic storm in Brugada syndrome; this case leaves open cilostazol utility and alternative needs.
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a disease with a high risk of developing ventricular arrhythmias leading to sudden cardiac death. Although an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the first treatment option for symptomatic BrS, as it terminates malignant arrhythmias, it does not prevent arrhythmic events. 1 Therefore, in subjects with an ICD who present with a VT/VF episode, a beneficial effect of long-term management with drugs like quinidine and cilostazol has been described.2 Herein, we present the long-term follow-up of a patient with BrS where cilostazol had no clinical benefit and who developed an arrhythmic storm after quinidine suspension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estrada-Magana et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: