Why the study?
Does jejunoileal bypass improve cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in obese patients at 25-year follow-up?
Does jejunoileal bypass improve cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in obese patients at 25-year follow-up?
Jejunoileal bypass provides persistent long-term reductions in body weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol 25 years post-operation in patients with intact shunts.
Sustained metabolic gains in select patients warrant cautious consideration; extends long-term observational data but leaves randomized mortality evidence open.
OBJECTIVE: Jejunoileal (JI) bypass was a widely performed surgical procedure for morbid obesity in the 1970s. The purpose of this study was to assess cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in patients 25 years or more after this operation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All (n = 36) patients operated on for obesity with JI bypass at Haukeland University Hospital between 1971 and 1976 were evaluated. Survivors (n = 28) participated in a follow-up that included clinical examination and biochemical tests. Preoperative data were compared with data at 1 year (3 years) and 25 years. Causes of death were identified for the deceased. RESULTS: For the 23 patients alive with intact JI shunts at 25 years there was a statistically significant lowering of body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.01), systolic blood pressure (p < 0.05), diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) and serum cholesterol (p < 0.05) compared to before the operation. There was no statistically significant change in fasting blood glucose or serum triglyceride. The serum insulin level was normal in all but one (21/22) of the patients examined. Three out of 26 patients with intact JI shunts, and 5 out of 10 patients with reversed JI shunts, had died. CONCLUSION: For patients with intact shunts there is a persistent reduction in body weight, serum cholesterol and blood pressure, and a reduced insulin resistance 25 years after JI bypass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Våge et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: