This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We investigated the mechanism of candidacidal action of a Lys/Leu-rich α-helical model antimicrobial peptide (K(9)L(8)W) and its diastereomeric peptide (D(9)-K(9)L(8)W) composed of D,L-amino acids. K(9)L(8)W killed completely Candida albicans within 30 min, but D(9)-K(9)L(8)W killed only 72% of C. albicans even after 100 min. Tryptophan fluorescence spectroscopy indicated that the fungal cell selectivity of D(9)-K(9)L(8)W is closely correlated with a selective interaction with the negatively charged PC/PE/PI/ergosterol (5:2.5:2.5:1, w/w/w/w) phospholipids, which mimic the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane of C. albicans. K(9)L(8)W was able to induce almost 100% calcein leakage from PC/PE/PI/ergosterol (5:2.5:2.5:1, w/w/w/w) liposomes at a peptide:lipid molar ratio of 1:16, whereas D(9)-K(9)L(8)W caused only 25% dye leakage even at a peptide:lipid molar ratio of 1:2. Confocal laser-scanning microscopy revealed that FITC-labeled D(9)-K(9)L(8)W penetrated the cell wall and cell membrane and accumulated inside the cells, whereas FITC-labeled K(9)L(8)W did not penetrate but associated with the membranes. Collectively, our results demonstrated that the candidacidal activity of K(9)L(8) W and D(9)-K(9)L(8)W may be due to the transmembrane pore/channel formation or perturbation of the fungal cytoplasmic membranes and the inhibition of intracellular functions, respectively. Finally, D(9)-K(9)L(8)W with potent anti-Candida activity but no hemolytic activity may be potentially a useful lead compound for the development of novel antifungal agents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: