Why the study?
Does peripheral fractional flow reserve correlate with post-exercise ankle-brachial index in claudicant patients with isolated iliac artery stenosis?
Does peripheral fractional flow reserve correlate with post-exercise ankle-brachial index in claudicant patients with isolated iliac artery stenosis?
Peripheral fractional flow reserve is a safe and feasible physiological test that correlates strongly with post-exercise ABI in patients with isolated iliac artery stenosis.
PURPOSE: To examine in claudicant patients with aortoiliac lesions the relationship between the post-exercise ankle-brachial index (ABI) and the peripheral fractional flow reserve (p-FFR), a physiological test that has heretofore been used to assess coronary and renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Sixteen male patients (mean age 68.1±7.5 years) with isolated iliac artery lesions detected by ultrasound in 17 limbs were enrolled in this study. Resting ABI was measured and a treadmill test was administered to measure the post-exercise ABI. During angiography, the p-FFR was measured using a pressure guidewire after administration of papaverine to induce hyperemia. Changes in the ABI during exercise and p-FFR at hyperemia were calculated. RESULTS: The mean resting ABI and post-exercise ABI were 0.87±0.12 and 0.65±0.24, respectively. There was no complication during the measurement of p-FFR. The mean p-FFR at hyperemia was 0.71±0.14. A significant linear correlation was observed between post-exercise ABI and p-FFR at hyperemia (r=0.857, p<0.001), which was stronger than the correlation between post-exercise ABI and peak-to-peak pressure gradient at hyperemia (r= -0.626, p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring p-FFR appears to be a feasible and safe procedure, and there is a significant linear correlation between post-exercise ABI and p-FFR in aortoiliac lesions. The p-FFR was more accurate than a peak-to-peak pressure gradient in assessing the physiological significance of a stenosis. Though larger studies are required, p-FFR might be used to physiologically assess stenosis in PAD patients with isolated aortoiliac lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hioki et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: