Why the study?
Does echocardiographic early diastolic driving force accurately predict left ventricular end diastolic pressure compared to left heart catheterization in patients scheduled for LVEDP estimation?
Does echocardiographic early diastolic driving force accurately predict left ventricular end diastolic pressure compared to left heart catheterization in patients scheduled for LVEDP estimation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early diastolic driving force calculated by echocardiography is a sensitive and specific non-invasive index for predicting elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, including in the diagnostic gray zone.
We thought that the early diastolic driving force (DF) can offer a clinically reliable method to determine left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). One hundred patients were scheduled for estimation of LVEDP by left-sided heart catheterization (LVEDPcath) and Echocardiography, via estimation of the mitral E wave velocity and its deceleration time (DT), to calculate the DF = density × volume × acceleration = 1.055 × (mitral valve area × velocity time integral) × peak E/acceleration time (AT) =1.055 × {(220/P1/2) × (E × AT)/2} × E/AT, if P1/2 = 0.29 DT, and hence DF = 400 E2/DT = 0.004 E2/DT Newton. Tissue Doppler estimation of the mitral annular E′ for the E/E′ ratio and septal (E/E′-S) and lateral (E/E′-L) was done. DF had a negative correlation (r = −0.63, P < 0.001), but E/E′-L and E/E′-S had positive correlations (r = 0.87 and 0.85 respectively, P < 0.001) with LVEDP. At a cutoff value of 0.1 N, DF had a sensitivity of 94.1%, specificity of 86.7%, to determine LVEDP > 16. E/E′-L is more sensitive and more specific than E/E′-S (72.9% and 93.3% vs. 58.8% and 86.7%) in prediction of LVEDPcath. DF is the almost powerful independent predictor of LVEDPcath (P = 0.002). DF had a coefficient = 0.619 (P < 0.001) for estimation of the LVEDP in the gray zone. Early diastolic DF could be used as a reliable index for elevated LVEDP, especially in the gray zone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ammar et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: