Why the study?
Does left ventricular hypertrophy affect diastolic and systolic function in untreated hypertensive patients?
Does left ventricular hypertrophy affect diastolic and systolic function in untreated hypertensive patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Left ventricular hypertrophy in untreated hypertensive patients is associated with impaired diastolic filling despite preserved systolic function, highlighting the utility of diastolic parameters as early markers of dysfunction.
A total of 20 untreated hypertensive patients were divided into two equal groups matched for sex, age and blood pressure but with [mean diastolic wall thickness (MDWT) greater than 1.2 cm] or without (MDWT greater than 1.2 cm) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). All patients underwent pulsed doppler echocardiography and 99Tc radionuclide ventriculography at rest to assess diastolic and systolic abnormalities. In hypertensives with LVH the interventricular wall thickness, posterior wall thickness and relative diastolic wall thickness were significantly (P less than 0.01) higher and peak filling rate was significantly (P less than 0.01) lower than in hypertensives without LVH. The indices of systolic function, however, were not significantly different in the two patient groups. In hypertensives without LVH peak filling rate directly correlated with heart rate, whereas in those with LVH peak filling rate directly correlated with heart rate and the ratio of peak velocity of early left ventricular filling : peak velocity of late left ventricular filling due to atrial contraction. It is concluded that diastolic parameters may be useful tools for assessing myocardial compliance and may be effective markers of diastolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galderisi et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: