The PKC beta-activated pathway is important in signaling heterologous, but not homologous, PAR-1 desensitization in endothelial cells.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PKC beta effects on endothelial PAR-1 remain preclinical; leaves open its role in human thrombin signaling and vascular therapies.
We studied the effects of protein kinase C (PKC) activation on endothelial cell surface expression and function of the proteolytically activated thrombin receptor 1 (PAR-1). Cell surface PAR-1 expression was assessed by immunofluorescence (using anti-PAR-1 monoclonal antibody), and receptor activation was assessed by measuring increases in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC) exposed to alpha-thrombin or phorbol ester, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Immunofluorescence showed that thrombin and TPA reduced the cell surface expression of PAR-1. Prior exposure of HMEC to thrombin for 5 min desensitized the cells to thrombin, indicating homologous PAR-1 desensitization. In contrast, prior activation of PKC with TPA produced desensitization to thrombin and histamine, indicating heterologous PAR-1 desensitization. Treatment of cells with staurosporine, a PKC inhibitor, fully prevented heterologous desensitization, whereas thrombin-induced homologous desensitization persisted. Depletion of PKC beta isozymes (PKC beta I and PKC beta II) by transducing cells with antisense cDNA of PKC beta I prevented the TPA-induced decrease in cell surface PAR-1 expression and restored approximately 60% of the cytosolic Ca2+ signal in response to thrombin. In contrast, depletion of PKC beta isozymes did not affect the loss of cell surface PAR-1 and induction of homologous PAR-1 desensitization by thrombin. Therefore, homologous PAR-1 desensitization by thrombin occurs independently of PKC beta isozymes, whereas the PKC beta-activated pathway is important in signaling heterologous PAR-1 desensitization in endothelial cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: