Key result
An athletic lifestyle is linked to ~190% higher cardiovascular efficiency in non-smokers versus sedentary peers.
Why the study?
Smoking and sedentary behaviour are common among university students, but their combined effect on cardiorespiratory fitness is rarely compared directly within the same cohort.
Does physical activity improve cardiovascular efficiency in male university students regardless of smoking status?
Cross-Sectional (n=95)
Does physical activity improve cardiovascular efficiency in male university students regardless of smoking status?
Absolute Event Rate: 78.61% vs 27.06%
p-value: p=<.001
Regular physical activity is associated with markedly higher cardiovascular efficiency even among smokers, whereas a sedentary lifestyle is associated with the poorest fitness.
Smoking plus sedentary behavior may impair fitness in young men; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease risk, yet smoking and sedentary behaviour are both common among university students and their combined effect on fitness is rarely compared directly within the same cohort. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 95 male university students (of 96 recruited; 21–25 years) were purposively assigned to three lifestyle groups — smoker athletes (n = 32), non-smoker athletes (n = 31), and sedentary non-smokers (n = 32) — and assessed using the Harvard Step Test. Cardiovascular efficiency (CVE) was derived from the Physical Fitness Index formula. Group distributions were non-normal and variances were unequal, so the independent-samples Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn–Bonferroni pairwise comparisons was used. Results: An independent-samples Kruskal–Wallis test showed that CVE differed significantly across the three lifestyle groups (p < .001). Non-smoker athletes (M = 78.61, SD = 16.99) had higher CVE than smoker athletes (M = 51.41, SD = 9.91), who in turn had higher CVE than sedentary non-smokers (M = 27.06, SD = 4.38); all pairwise comparisons were significant (adjusted p < .001). Conclusion: Regular physical activity was associated with markedly higher cardiovascular efficiency even among smokers, while a sedentary lifestyle — independent of smoking status — was associated with the poorest fitness of all three groups, underscoring physical inactivity as at least as important a target as smoking cessation in university health promotion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2026) reported a cross-sectional. Regular physical activity and smoking status vs. Sedentary non-smokers was evaluated on Cardiovascular efficiency (CVE) (p=<.001). Non-smoker athletes had the highest cardiovascular efficiency (mean 78.61), followed by smoker athletes (51.41), and sedentary non-smokers (27.06; adjusted p<0.001 for all comparisons).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: