Key result
In a rodent model of anaphylactic shock, ABT-491 prevented the decrease in left ventricular shortening fraction (50% vs 36%, P=0.01) and reduced the required epinephrine dose (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Anaphylactic shock can remain lethal despite epinephrine, high epinephrine doses cause severe complications, and platelet-activating factor levels correlate with shock severity.
Does ABT-491 improve hemodynamics and reduce epinephrine requirements in a rodent model of anaphylactic shock?
Does ABT-491 improve hemodynamics and reduce epinephrine requirements in a rodent model of anaphylactic shock?
In a rodent model of anaphylactic shock, the PAF-receptor antagonist ABT-491 improved cardiac function and synergistically reduced the required dose of epinephrine.
Suggests PAF-receptor antagonism may mitigate cardiac dysfunction during anaphylaxis; leaves open whether these.
BACKGROUND: In some cases, anaphylactic shock (AS) is still lethal, despite rapid use of epinephrine. High doses of epinephrine are associated with severe complications. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is secreted in massive amounts during AS, and a high plasma level is correlated with increased AS severity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of ABT-491, a PAF-receptor antagonist and possible adjunct treatment, alone or in combination with epinephrine during AS. METHODS: by continuous infusion, followed by a reducing protocol) and EPI-ABT (both treatments). RESULTS: Ovalbumin injection resulted in a severe decrease in mean arterial pressure, left ventricular inotropy (max dP/dt) and left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF). All rats from the ABT group survived until the end of the experiment. ABT-491 prevented the LVSF decrease observed in the SHOCK group (at T15: ABT 50% ± 11% vs SHOCK 36% ± 9%, P = .01), significantly reduced the dose of epinephrine needed to treat anaphylactic shock (EPI-ABT 314 ± 67 µg/kg vs EPI 475 ± 69 µg/kg, P < .001) and reduced the time to restore basal MAP (ABT 23 ± 7 minutes vs EPI-ABT 13 ± 5 minutes, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AS was characterized by early cardiac dysfunction in our model. Treatment with ABT-491 allowed survival until the end of the experiment and reduced cardiac dysfunction. Use of the PAF-R antagonist had a synergistic effect with epinephrine and allowed a significant reduction in epinephrine consumption. Use of PAF-R antagonists during AS could reduce epinephrine-related complications and improve the treatment of epinephrine refractory cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tacquard et al. (2019) studied Anaphylactic shock. ABT-491 (PAF-receptor antagonist) vs. No treatment (SHOCK group) or Epinephrine alone was evaluated on Left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF) at T15 (p=0.01). In a rodent model of anaphylactic shock, ABT-491 prevented the decrease in left ventricular shortening fraction (50% vs 36%, P=0.01) and reduced the required epinephrine dose (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: