Key result
A shortened Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain demonstrated higher sensitivity (50.7%) than the full questionnaire (29.9%) for identifying a medical record of angina.
Why the study?
Does a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire perform better than the full version in identifying post-menopausal women with a medical diagnosis of angina?
Population
3987 women aged 60 to 79 years from 23 British towns
Comparison
Shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire vs Full Rose angina questionnaire
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May aid angina detection in post-menopausal women; leaves open need for prospective validation before any practice change.
Cross-Sectional (n=3,987)
Yes
Does a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire perform better than the full version in identifying post-menopausal women with a medical diagnosis of angina?
Absolute Event Rate: 50.7% vs 29.9%
A shortened, three-question version of the Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain is more sensitive than the full version for identifying angina in post-menopausal women.
Debbie A. Lawlor (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Angina (n=3,987). Shortened Rose angina questionnaire (exertional chest pain) vs. Full Rose angina questionnaire (definite Rose angina) was evaluated on Sensitivity for identifying any medical record diagnosis of angina. A shortened Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain demonstrated higher sensitivity (50.7%) than the full questionnaire (29.9%) for identifying a medical record of angina.