Key result
Rose angina questionnaire shows moderate repeatability and links to thicker carotid walls and MI.
Why the study?
The repeatability and validity of the Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris in a large, diverse population were assessed to support its use in epidemiological studies.
Is the Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris repeatable and valid in a population-based cohort?
Population
Nearly 16,000 black and white men and women in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
Comparison
Repeatability and validity of Rose questionnaire angina pectoris determinations
Design
Population cohort study with repeated questionnaire administration
Follow-up
Yearly intervals
Authors
Loading...
Moderate repeatability cautions against routine clinical use; leaves open need for refined angina tools in research.
Cohort (n=16,000)
Yes
Is the Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris repeatable and valid in a population-based cohort?
Effect estimate: kappa 0.36 (white men), 0.30 (white women), 0.23 (black men), 0.22 (black women)
The Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris demonstrates moderate repeatability and validity, supporting its continued use in epidemiological studies.
Sorlie et al. (1996) conducted a cohort in Angina pectoris (n=16,000). Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris was evaluated on Repeatability (agreement of positive Rose AP determinations taken 1 year apart) (kappa 0.36 (white men), 0.30 (white women), 0.23 (black men), 0.22 (black women)). The Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris demonstrated moderate repeatability (kappa 0.22-0.36) and was validly associated with thicker carotid artery walls, heart attack, and risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: