Key result
AI-predicted age from echocardiography linked to ~42% higher mortality risk per 10-year increase.
Why the study?
While chronological age is a universal risk predictor, distinguishing biologically older from younger individuals may identify accelerated or delayed cardiovascular aging.
Does an AI model predicting age from echocardiography videos accurately estimate biological age and improve cardiovascular risk stratification compared to chronological age?
Observational (n=185,494)
Yes
Does an AI model predicting age from echocardiography videos accurately estimate biological age and improve cardiovascular risk stratification compared to chronological age?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI-predicted age from echocardiograms serves as a marker of biological cardiac aging and provides stronger prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes than chronological age.
While chronological age is a universal risk predictor across most populations and diseases, distinguishing between biologically older from younger individuals may identify individuals with accelerated or delayed cardiovascular aging. This study presents a deep learning model to predict age from echocardiogram videos, leveraging 2,610,266 videos from 166,508 studies from 90,738 patients. Leveraging multi-view echocardiography, our model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.76 (6.65–6.87) years and a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.732 (0.72–0.74) on Cedars-Sinai Medical Center test set. Consistent performance was observed across four external validation cohorts. Predictions were associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease, heart failure, and stroke, and captured discontinuities before and after a heart transplant. Guided back propagation highlighted the model’s focus on the mitral valve, mitral apparatus, and basal inferior wall, underscoring the potential of computer vision-based assessment of echocardiography in enhancing cardiovascular risk assessment and aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rawlani et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease and biological aging (n=185,494). AI-predicted age from echocardiography vs. Chronological age was evaluated on All-cause mortality (per 10-year increase in predicted age) (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.37-1.48, p=<0.005). An artificial intelligence model predicting age from echocardiogram videos achieved a mean absolute error of 6.76 years, and a 10-year increase in predicted age was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.42) compared to chronological age.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: