Key result
Cardiodynamicsgram demonstrated an overall diagnostic accuracy of 84.9%, sensitivity of 84.0%, and specificity of 86.1% for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared to SPECT MPI.
Why the study?
Early detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities is significant for CAD prevention, prompting evaluation of the novel noninvasive Cardiodynamicsgram in suspected ischemic heart disease.
Does Cardiodynamicsgram (CDG) accurately detect myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared to SPECT MPI in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease?
Observational (n=86)
Single-blind
No
Does Cardiodynamicsgram (CDG) accurately detect myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared to SPECT MPI in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease?
Cardiodynamicsgram (CDG) is a promising, cost-effective, and noninvasive tool with high diagnostic accuracy for the early detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities.
Myocardial perfusion abnormalities are the first sign of the ischemic cascade in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, the early detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities is significant for the prevention of CAD. Recently, a novel noninvasive method named Cardiodynamicsgram (CDG) has been proposed for early detection of CAD. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of CDG in myocardial perfusion abnormalities for suspected ischemic heart disease. In the study, 86 suspected patients were enrolled. Standard 12-lead ECG and CDG were performed simultaneously before single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Diagnostic accuracy of CDG for myocardial perfusion abnormalities detection is assessed using SPECT MPI as the reference standard. Of these 86 suspected patients, 37 patients were positive in CDG, 49 patients were negative in CDG. Diagnostic accuracy of CDG at presentation for myocardial perfusion abnormalities was 84.9%, sensitivity 84.0%, and specificity 89.4%. Furthermore, of the 10 patients whose SPECT MPI results are reverse redistribution, 9 patients were positive in CDG. Underlying causes of false positive CDG findings included the factors that can change the stability of cardiac electrical conduction and measurement noise. Myocardial remodeling in patients with old myocardial infarction might be the major cause of false negative findings. Results show a good consistency between the CDG and SPECT MPI in evaluating myocardial perfusion abnormalities. It suggests that CDG might be used as a cost-effective tool for assessing the myocardial perfusion abnormalities in the clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Suspected ischemic heart disease (n=86). Cardiodynamicsgram (CDG) vs. SPECT MPI was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for myocardial perfusion abnormalities. Cardiodynamicsgram demonstrated an overall diagnostic accuracy of 84.9%, sensitivity of 84.0%, and specificity of 86.1% for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared to SPECT MPI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: