In Vitro Femoral Stiffness After Femoral Neck Osteotomy and Osteosynthesis with Defined Surgical Errors

In our search for an osteosynthesis device that would tolerate the surgical errors of the inexperienced surgeon, we tested in vitro femoral stiffness in 75 human osteoporotic femora after internal fixation of a cervical neck osteotomy using three commonly used devices: two von Bahr screws (A. Ericsson AB, Sweden), two cannulated screws (Uppsala type, Olmed AB, Sweden), and two hookpins (LiH, PSAB, Sweden). The first device has its main grip in the cancellous bone by threads; the second has grip in cancellous and subchondral bone by threads; and the third, which has no threads, has its grip in cancellous bone by a hook pin. The intact specimen was in all instances stiffer (22-63%) than the osteosynthesized specimen (p < 0.001). An osteosynthesized femur with perfectly reduced bone ends was 14-23% stiffer than when reduction of the bone ends was insufficient, irrespective of device malposition (p < 0.001). Insufficient reduction of the osteotomy leaving a 20 degrees dorsal angulation of the femoral head combined with too far ventrally placed screws resulted in the lowest femoral stiffness. If reduction of osteotomy was sufficient, screws placed too far ventrally or converging screws did not result in decreased stiffness compared with optimal screw placement. Irrespective of the quality of reduction, osteosynthesis with the Uppsala screw resulted in all instances in a higher stiffness than using the other devices (p < 0.01). With the Uppsala screw design, femoral stiffness after optimal osteosynthesis was reduced by 22% compared with the intact femur, and in the most unfavorable position with combined malreduction and malpositioning it was reduced by 42%. Corresponding values for the von Bahr screws were 29% and 46%, respectively, and for the LiH screws 47% and 63%, respectively. Use of a device with threads and grip in the subchondral bone is recommended for fixation of femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic bone. Furthermore, the importance of anatomical reduction for fracture fixation is emphasized.