Key result
Virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) derived from three-dimensional angiography shows reasonable correlation with invasive FFR, though computational assumptions currently limit its widespread use.
Why the study?
Does virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) derived from three-dimensional angiography provide a reliable surrogate for invasive FFR in assessing coronary artery disease?
Does virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) derived from three-dimensional angiography provide a reliable surrogate for invasive FFR in assessing coronary artery disease?
Virtual FFR derived from 3D angiography shows promise as a wire-free alternative to invasive FFR, though computational limitations currently prevent its widespread clinical adoption.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has shown a high success rate in the treatment of coronary artery disease. The decision to perform PCI often relies on the cardiologist's visual interpretation of coronary lesions during angiography. This has inherent limitations, particularly due to the low resolution and two-dimensional nature of angiography. State-of-the-art modalities such as three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) may improve clinicians' understanding of both the anatomical and physiological importance of coronary lesions. While invasive FFR is the gold standard technique for assessment of the haemodynamic significance of coronary lesions, recent studies have explored a surrogate for FFR derived solely from three-dimensional reconstruction of the invasive angiogram, and therefore eliminating need for a pressure wire. Utilizing advanced computational fluid dynamics research, this virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) has demonstrated reasonable correlation with invasive measurements and remains an intense area of ongoing study. However, at present, several limitations and computational fluid dynamic assumptions may preclude vFFR from widespread clinical use. This review demonstrates the tight integration of advanced three-dimensional imaging techniques and vFFR in assessing coronary artery disease, reviews the advantages and disadvantages of such techniques and attempts to provide a glimpse of how such advances may benefit future clinical decision-making during PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poon et al. (2015) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) and three-dimensional coronary imaging vs. Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) was evaluated. Virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) derived from three-dimensional angiography shows reasonable correlation with invasive FFR, though computational assumptions currently limit its widespread use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: