Key result
Elevated sTNF-R1 was associated with increased incident heart failure risk (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.15-2.46), though it did not improve risk model discrimination.
Why the study?
Are elevated baseline levels of sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2 associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure in older adults?
Cohort (n=1,285)
Are elevated baseline levels of sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2 associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure in older adults?
Hazard Ratio: 1.68 (95% CI 1.15–2.46)
Does not improve HF risk prediction in older adults; hypothesis-generating for sTNF-R1 in incident HFpEF.
BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels are associated with risk for heart failure (HF). The soluble TNF type 1 (sTNF-R1) and type 2 (sTNF-R2) receptors are elevated in patients with manifest HF, but whether they are associated with risk for incident HF is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Cox proportional hazard models, we examined the association between baseline levels of sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2 with incident HF risk among 1285 participants of the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study (age, 74.0±2.9 years; 51.4% women; 41.1% black). At baseline, median (interquartile range) of TNF, sTNF-R1, and sTNF-R2 levels was 3.14 (2.42-4.06), 1.46 (1.25-1.76), and 3.43 (2.95-4.02) ng/mL, respectively. During a median follow-up of 11.4 (6.9-11.7) years, 233 (18.1%) participants developed HF. In models controlling for other HF risk factors, TNF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.61 per log2 increase) and sTNF-R1 (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.46 per log2 increase), but not sTNF-R2 (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.80-1.63 per log2 increase), were associated with a higher risk for HF. These associations were consistent across whites and blacks (TNF, sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2; interaction P=0.531, 0.091, and 0.795, respectively) and in both sexes (TNF, sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2; interaction P=0.491, 0.672, and 0.999, respectively). TNF-R1 was associated with a higher risk for HF with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03-3.18; P=0.038 for preserved versus HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.56-1.44; P=0.667 for reduced ejection fraction; interaction P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In older adults, elevated levels of sTNF-R1 are associated with increased risk for incident HF. However, addition of TNF-R1 to the previously validated Health ABC HF risk model did not demonstrate material improvement in net discrimination or reclassification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marti et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=1,285). Soluble TNF type 1 (sTNF-R1) receptor vs. Lower levels (per log2 increase) was evaluated on Incident heart failure (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.15-2.46). Elevated sTNF-R1 was associated with increased incident heart failure risk (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.15-2.46), though it did not improve risk model discrimination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: