Methodological protocol establishes standardized procedures for in vivo metabolic phenotyping in pigs, highlighting reliable assessments of insulin sensitivity and secretion.
The pig is a valuable animal model in diabetes research; however, standardized protocols are essential for evaluating in vivo metabolism. Here, we present a protocol for in vivo assessment of glucose control and insulin secretion and sensitivity in the pig. We describe steps for catheter implantation, testing of intravenous glucose tolerance, performance of hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps (HECs) and hyperglycemic clamps (HGCs), and blood processing. We then detail procedures for analysis of plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, and C-peptide concentrations as well as data analysis. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Renner et al. 1 and Renner et al. 2 • Phenotyping recommendations for metabolic research in the pig • Refined catheter insertion techniques for stress-free blood sampling • Techniques for intravenous glucose tolerance test and glucose clamps • Recommendations for sample processing and relevant hormone assays Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics. The pig is a valuable animal model in diabetes research; however, standardized protocols are essential for evaluating in vivo metabolism. Here, we present a protocol for in vivo assessment of glucose control and insulin secretion and sensitivity in the pig. We describe steps for catheter implantation, testing of intravenous glucose tolerance, performance of hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps (HECs) and hyperglycemic clamps (HGCs), and blood processing. We then detail procedures for analysis of plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, and C-peptide concentrations as well as data analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eckstein et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: