Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phenomenographic study reveals diverse conceptions of artificial intelligence in university educators, highlighting the complex reality of educational practice.
Understanding what counts as good education in technological iterations is critical. Adopting a phenomenographic perspective, this study critically investigates how AI is understood and framed by higher education teachers. Based on interviews with 16 teachers in Danish higher education, teachers’ conceptions of AI in higher education teaching processes and student learning processes are identified along with their approaches to designing AI into student learning experiences. The empirical study identifies three qualitatively different ways of understanding the relationship between teaching and AI and three qualitatively different ways of understanding the relationship between learning and AI. Further, four qualitatively different approaches to designing for student learning experiences around AI are mapped. The identified outcome spaces highlight the plurality and messiness that undergird educational practice. The study also points to the need to pay attention to agency and teachers’ labour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria Hvid Stenalt (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: