Key result
Framework links epidemiological tools to Progressive Control Pathway stages to eliminate foot-and-mouth disease in Southeast Asia.
Why the study?
Foot-and-mouth disease causes major livestock losses in Southeast Asia, where countries progress through Progressive Control Pathway stages under diverse resource settings.
This review provides a practical framework aligning epidemiological tools with the Progressive Control Pathway requirements to support sustainable foot-and-mouth disease control in Southeast Asia.
Offers a roadmap for FMD elimination in Southeast Asia; leaves open real-world validation and adaptation.
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) causes significant losses for livestock farmers in affected countries and regions, including Southeast Asia, where several countries are progressing through different stages of the Progressive Control Pathway (PCP) under diverse resource settings. The PCP, developed by the World Organization for Animal Health and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, is an outcome-oriented strategy designed to support progress toward the elimination of FMD. In this review paper, we propose an evidence-based framework linking epidemiological tools to each PCP stage requirements based on studies conducted in eight Southeast Asian countries through peer-reviewed research and gray literature. The findings indicate that Stage 1 progression is supported through risk-factor analyses, seroprevalence studies, and participatory epidemiology, while Stage 2 relies on spatial analyses and evaluations of control strategies. Progression to Stage 3 requires evidence of active surveillance systems for rapid detection of new viral incursions, whereas later stages depend on risk assessment, sustained surveillance, and restricting transboundary animal movement. Regional challenges include underreporting, surveillance-system deficiencies, and inconsistent vaccination monitoring. The framework proposed herein provides a practical approach for aligning the generation of evidence with PCP requirements. Ultimately, strengthened regional collaboration that coordinates transboundary risk management is crucial for progress toward sustainable FMD control in Southeast Asia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunasekera et al. (2026) conducted a review in Foot-and-mouth disease. Epidemiological tools was evaluated. An evidence-based framework links epidemiological tools to Progressive Control Pathway stages to support the elimination of foot-and-mouth disease in Southeast Asia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: