Why the study?
Does lower socio-economic status increase 30-day mortality in patients undergoing non-emergency CABG?
Does lower socio-economic status increase 30-day mortality in patients undergoing non-emergency CABG?
Lower socio-economic status is an independent predictor of increased 30-day mortality and serious complications following non-emergency CABG.
Supports incorporating deprivation into CABG risk models; leaves open whether interventions reduce excess mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of socio-economic status (SES) on the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Regional cardiac surgical unit. PATIENTS: 1994 consecutive patients undergoing non-emergency CABG. MEASURES: SES was determined from the patient's postcode using Carstairs tables. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: There were 50 deaths (2.5%) within 30 days of surgery. A higher Carstairs score demonstrated a trend towards increased 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.09 per unit, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.20, p = 0.06). In a backward conditional model, including other predictors of early mortality, Carstairs scores were independently predictive (OR 1.12 per unit, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.24, p = 0.02). In a model including only Carstairs scores and the EuroSCORE, both were independent predictors of this outcome (OR for Carstairs score 1.11 per unit, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.22, p = 0.04). The 30-day mortality increases in each quartile of Carstairs scores, with patients in quartile 4 (most deprived) at significantly higher risk compared with quartile 1 (uncorrected OR 2.53 per unit, 95% CI 1.04 to 6.15; OR corrected for EuroSCORE, 2.56 per unit, 95% CI 1.03 to 6.34, p = 0.04 for both). Similarly, patients in the least affluent quartile were twice as likely to suffer a serious complication as those in the most affluent quartile (OR 2.14 per unit, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.46, p = 0.002). This increased risk was also independent of the EuroSCORE. CONCLUSIONS: Lower SES is associated with a poorer early outcome following CABG and is independent of other recognised risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibson et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: