Why the study?
Does partial left heart bypass compare favorably to subtotal left heart bypass in terms of effects on the failing heart and body?
Does partial left heart bypass compare favorably to subtotal left heart bypass in terms of effects on the failing heart and body?
This review discusses the experimental and theoretical data supporting partial versus subtotal left heart bypass for circulatory support.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Partial versus subtotal left heart bypass remains unresolved for circulatory support; leaves open prospective clinical trials before practice consideration.
A number of systems for left heart bypass have been described for short, or long-term circulatory support in animals and in man. Critical to the interpretation of these restuls and to the design of new system is the proportion of left ventricular inflow destined for ejection which is diverted through the apparatus, to that expelled through the aortic valve, and the effect which this fraction might have on the failing heart and the rest of the body. It is the purpose of this communication to review the experimental and theoretical data in support of partial, as opposed to subtotal, left heart bypass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John H. Kennedy (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: