Why the study?
Does rocuronium reduce recovery time of neuromuscular function compared to pancuronium in adult patients undergoing fast-track cardiac surgery?
Does rocuronium reduce recovery time of neuromuscular function compared to pancuronium in adult patients undergoing fast-track cardiac surgery?
Rocuronium significantly reduces the duration of neuromuscular blockade compared to pancuronium, preventing delayed extubation in fast-track cardiac surgery.
Supports preferring rocuronium to prevent delayed extubation after fast-track cardiac surgery; confirms faster neuromuscular recovery versus pancuronium.
The majority of cardiac anaesthetists in the UK use pancuronium for fast-track cardiac surgery. We compared the duration of action of pancuronium and rocuronium in patients undergoing fast-track hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac surgery. We determined whether patients would have had residual neuromuscular blockade at extubation. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to receive either pancuronium 0.1 mg x kg(-1) or rocuronium 1 mg x kg(-1). Neuromuscular function was assessed by acceleromyography; spontaneous recovery was evaluated by the train-of-four ratio measured at the adductor pollicis longus muscle. Median times to recover train-of-four ratio of 0.9 were 3 h 38 min for rocuronium and 7 h 52 min for pancuronium. The median difference in recovery times was 4 h 15 min (95% CI 2 h 30 min to 6 h 20 min; p = 0.0003 by Mann-Whitney test). None of the patients in the rocuronium group and seven of 10 patients in the pancuronium group had their extubations delayed because of residual neuromuscular blockade. Unless fast-track patients have neuromuscular function assessed before extubation, pancuronium should not be used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: