Key result
Continuous spinal anesthesia using microcatheters is associated with technical problems, post-dural puncture headache (up to 40% in parturients), and neurologic complications.
Comparison
Continuous spinal anesthesia using a 28-gauge… vs Macrocatheter technique or other regional…
Design
Editorial
Authors
Loading...
Urges caution against routine microcatheter continuous spinal anesthesia; leaves open whether protocol refinements could reduce risks in select cases.
Routine use of continuous spinal anesthesia with microcatheters is not recommended due to significant safety concerns including cauda equina syndrome and technical failures.
Terese T. Horlocker (1998) conducted a letter in Patients requiring regional anesthesia. Continuous spinal anesthesia using a microcatheter vs. Macrocatheter technique was evaluated. Continuous spinal anesthesia using microcatheters is associated with technical problems, post-dural puncture headache (up to 40% in parturients), and neurologic complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: