Why the study?
Pakistan and Afghanistan remain the only reservoirs of wild poliovirus transmission, and pre-COVID-19 pandemic plans to stop WPV1 and persistent cVDPV2 transmission did not appear on track to succeed.
Does trivalent OPV compared to monovalent OPV improve the likelihood of stopping poliovirus transmission in Pakistan and Afghanistan?
Does trivalent OPV compared to monovalent OPV improve the likelihood of stopping poliovirus transmission in Pakistan and Afghanistan?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using trivalent OPV for supplementary immunization activities may be more effective than monovalent OPV for stopping poliovirus transmission in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
BACKGROUND: Pakistan and Afghanistan remain the only reservoirs of wild poliovirus transmission. Prior modeling suggested that before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, plans to stop the transmission of serotype 1 wild poliovirus (WPV1) and persistent serotype 2 circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV2) did not appear on track to succeed. METHODS: We updated an existing poliovirus transmission and Sabin-strain oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) evolution model for Pakistan and Afghanistan to characterize the impacts of immunization disruptions and restrictions on human interactions (ie, population mixing) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We also consider different options for responding to outbreaks and for preventive supplementary immunization activities (SIAs). RESULTS: The modeling suggests that with some resumption of activities in the fall of 2020 to respond to cVDPV2 outbreaks and full resumption on 1 January 2021 of all polio immunization activities to pre-COVID-19 levels, Pakistan and Afghanistan would remain off-track for stopping all transmission through 2023 without improvements in quality. CONCLUSIONS: Using trivalent OPV (tOPV) for SIAs instead of serotype 2 monovalent OPV offers substantial benefits for ending the transmission of both WPV1 and cVDPV2, because tOPV increases population immunity for both serotypes 1 and 2 while requiring fewer SIA rounds, when effectively delivered in transmission areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalkowska et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: