Why the study?
Both nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine reduce propofol consumption during anesthesia maintenance, but their propofol-sparing effects had not been compared.
Does nitrous oxide or dexmedetomidine reduce total consumption of propofol in adult patients undergoing elective surgery?
Does nitrous oxide or dexmedetomidine reduce total consumption of propofol in adult patients undergoing elective surgery?
Both nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine significantly decrease the total consumption of propofol during general anesthesia, with dexmedetomidine offering a potentially safer alternative to nitrous oxide.
Adjuvants may spare propofol; leaves open which agent is preferable in larger trials.
Background: Use of both nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine as anesthetic adjuvants has shown to reduce the consumption of propofol required for the maintenance of anesthesia. The present study evaluated these two agents for their propofol sparing effect which has not been compared so far. Materials and Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing elective surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups. Patients in group P received propofol started at 166 μg/kg/min and then titrated to maintain the Bi-Spectral Index (BIS) value between 40 and 60, while patients in group N and in group D received nitrous oxide as carrier gas and infusion of dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg over 10 min followed by 0.5 μg/kg/h) respectively, in addition to propofol. Primary outcome of the study was total consumption of propofol. Secondary outcomes measured were intraoperative hemodynamics, recovery profile, residual sedation, rescue analgesic requirements, and relevant side effects. Results: Total consumption of propofol was significantly higher in group P (139.02 ± 65.24 μg) compared to group N (94.72 ± 48.04 μg) and group D (98.31 ± 39.45 μg) (mean difference [95% confidence interval] group P and N 44.3 [17.9–44.7]; group P and D 40.71 [26.0–52.8]; group N and D 3.59 [−5.3–21.5]) ( P = 0.015). Although the recovery parameters (time to extubation, time to achieve BIS of 90, and time to verbal commands) were significantly prolonged in group D ( P < 0.001), time to discharge from postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was comparable among all groups ( P = 0.65). When arrived in PACU, patients in group D were significantly more sedated ( P = 0.0005) however, the 30 min in PACU the difference was nonsignificant. None of the patients in group D had nausea and vomiting and did not require additional analgesics. Conclusion: Both nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine significantly decreased the total consumption of propofol. Hence, both these agents can be used as potential anesthetic adjuvants to decrease the side effects associated with propofol infusion. Due to the lack of any reported environmental and long-term side effects, dexmedetomidine can be a safer and better alternative to nitrous oxide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biyani et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: